Trending...
- Liquidity Aggregation: US-Registered JHKXWL Integrates AI Analytics for Brazilian and Global Institutional Traders
- City of Spokane Funds 50 New Shelter Beds, Mobile Medication Assisted Treatment Services
- How California Convinces Buyers Not to Purchase New Cars — and How This Hurts Dealers
Florida Supreme Court Grants Petition Alleging Judicial Misconduct, Constitutional Violations, and Systemic Obstruction in the Ninth Judicial Circuit
ORLANDO, Fla. - Washingtoner -- By Folksalert
In a rare and decisive move, the Florida Supreme Court, Case No. SC2025-0317, has granted an amended petition filed by pro se litigant and FolksAlert podcast host Rayon Payne, who alleges widespread judicial misconduct and systemic constitutional violations stemming from Florida's Ninth Judicial Circuit and the Sixth District Court of Appeal.
The Court's March 14, 2025 order marked a highly unusual step—especially for a pro se litigant. After Payne filed his original petition and multiple supplements, the Court issued a directive: consolidate all filings into a single, comprehensive petition and attach it to a formal motion to amend. This level of procedural guidance is extraordinarily rare and signals the Court is actively engaged with the gravity of the issues raised. Payne complied, submitting a unified filing supported by over 700 pages of appendix material. The Florida Supreme Court has since granted the motion and placed the case under formal review.
More on Washingtoner
Payne's amended petition details a deeply troubling pattern of obstruction, fraud upon the court, and procedural manipulation by judges, attorneys, and institutions. At the center is Jermaine Carlos Diaz, also known as "Young Lace"—a two-time convicted child sex trafficker and registered lifetime sex offender—who used platforms like Instagram to promote and glamorize his criminal lifestyle. As a journalist and podcast host, Payne reported on Diaz's conduct, which sparked a 2019 lawsuit led by attorney Eric LaRue, who is now a central figure in the petition.
Judges named in the petition include Chief Judge Lisa Munyon, for permitting procedural abuse and declining to intervene despite clear evidence of misconduct. Judge Patricia Strowbridge, who stated on the record that she would not consider binding admissions and, when corrected on the law by Payne, told him to "seek legal advice."
The petition also highlights Navy Federal Credit Union, a federally chartered and regulated institution, for filing false and misleading statements in court to hide its financial relationship with Diaz. The filing questions how much illicit money—potentially linked to human trafficking—may have passed through Diaz's Navy Federal accounts.
More on Washingtoner
Two high-profile law firms are also named Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, which represented attorney Shannon Ramos in a California domestic violence case involving Payne. The California appellate court later reversed the ruling due to lack of evidence. That reversal became the basis for Payne's lawsuit in Florida. Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford P.A., implicated in enabling due process violations and advancing filings that allegedly furthered constitutional harm.
The Sixth District Court of Appeal is accused of enabling the trial court's actions and exceeding its authority by ruling on matters of constitutional and judicial misconduct without jurisdiction—thereby shielding the trial court from accountability.
"This isn't just about one litigant," Payne said. "This is about whether justice is real or conditional—whether courts protect the Constitution or the people who violate it. If judges can ignore wrongdoing, and appellate courts won't correct it, then what chance does anyone have?"
Legal observers, watchdog groups, and civil rights advocates are watching the case closely. The Florida Supreme Court's response could reshape judicial accountability and set national precedent.
Website: https://www.folksalert.com | Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/folksalerttv/
In a rare and decisive move, the Florida Supreme Court, Case No. SC2025-0317, has granted an amended petition filed by pro se litigant and FolksAlert podcast host Rayon Payne, who alleges widespread judicial misconduct and systemic constitutional violations stemming from Florida's Ninth Judicial Circuit and the Sixth District Court of Appeal.
The Court's March 14, 2025 order marked a highly unusual step—especially for a pro se litigant. After Payne filed his original petition and multiple supplements, the Court issued a directive: consolidate all filings into a single, comprehensive petition and attach it to a formal motion to amend. This level of procedural guidance is extraordinarily rare and signals the Court is actively engaged with the gravity of the issues raised. Payne complied, submitting a unified filing supported by over 700 pages of appendix material. The Florida Supreme Court has since granted the motion and placed the case under formal review.
More on Washingtoner
- AI, Fintech, and Cybersecurity Divisions Ignite High-Margin Growth: IQSTEL, Inc. (N A S D A Q: IQST)
- Liquidity Aggregation: US-Registered JHKXWL Integrates AI Analytics for Brazilian and Global Institutional Traders
- Q4 2025 Outlook: JGCMGS Unveils High-Frequency Infrastructure for Italian and Global Markets
- UK Financial Ltd Announces Full Ecosystem To Erc-3643 "SEC-Ready" Tokens For All UK Financial Ltd Tokenized Projects
- Pushing the Wave Series Launches Premium Hardback Editions of 2017–2022 and 2023 Volumes
Payne's amended petition details a deeply troubling pattern of obstruction, fraud upon the court, and procedural manipulation by judges, attorneys, and institutions. At the center is Jermaine Carlos Diaz, also known as "Young Lace"—a two-time convicted child sex trafficker and registered lifetime sex offender—who used platforms like Instagram to promote and glamorize his criminal lifestyle. As a journalist and podcast host, Payne reported on Diaz's conduct, which sparked a 2019 lawsuit led by attorney Eric LaRue, who is now a central figure in the petition.
Judges named in the petition include Chief Judge Lisa Munyon, for permitting procedural abuse and declining to intervene despite clear evidence of misconduct. Judge Patricia Strowbridge, who stated on the record that she would not consider binding admissions and, when corrected on the law by Payne, told him to "seek legal advice."
The petition also highlights Navy Federal Credit Union, a federally chartered and regulated institution, for filing false and misleading statements in court to hide its financial relationship with Diaz. The filing questions how much illicit money—potentially linked to human trafficking—may have passed through Diaz's Navy Federal accounts.
More on Washingtoner
- ZEELOOL 2025 Black Friday and Cyber Monday Big Deals
- Americans Are Building Family Legacies That Last Generations — Not Just Paychecks That Last a Month
- Bent Danholm Lists Contemporary Lakefront Residence in Winter Garden's Avalon Cove
- Safe Health Zones: A Global Breakthrough to Protect Night-Shift Workers from Preventable Harm
- ProfileSpider Launches Powerful One-Click Profile Scraper for Recruiters and Growth Teams
Two high-profile law firms are also named Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, which represented attorney Shannon Ramos in a California domestic violence case involving Payne. The California appellate court later reversed the ruling due to lack of evidence. That reversal became the basis for Payne's lawsuit in Florida. Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford P.A., implicated in enabling due process violations and advancing filings that allegedly furthered constitutional harm.
The Sixth District Court of Appeal is accused of enabling the trial court's actions and exceeding its authority by ruling on matters of constitutional and judicial misconduct without jurisdiction—thereby shielding the trial court from accountability.
"This isn't just about one litigant," Payne said. "This is about whether justice is real or conditional—whether courts protect the Constitution or the people who violate it. If judges can ignore wrongdoing, and appellate courts won't correct it, then what chance does anyone have?"
Legal observers, watchdog groups, and civil rights advocates are watching the case closely. The Florida Supreme Court's response could reshape judicial accountability and set national precedent.
Website: https://www.folksalert.com | Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/folksalerttv/
Source: Folksalert
0 Comments
Latest on Washingtoner
- Spokane: Council Approves New Transportation Tax on Commercial Parking
- Scoop Social Co.'s Mobile Dessert Truck Business Offer A Lifestyle Of Flavor, Fun, and Freedom
- Own 327 Acres of American Prime Real Estate with 2 Miles Waterfront Worth In Millions for Just $7 — Worldwide Raffle Launched
- Lakefront Acreage in Longwood's Ravensbrook Community Hits the Market
- Monika Balayan Elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts (FRSA)
- Spokane: Stuff Green Carts with Food and Yard Waste
- Fatal Early Morning House Fire in Northwest Spokane Claims Life of Chi
- We're Winning: Historic Plunge in Overdose Deaths Marks Stunning Reversal in America's Drug Crisis
- Tacoma: Applicants sought for the Human Rights Commission
- Tacoma: Applicants Sought for the Human Services Commission
- Spokane: City Closures Planned for Thanksgiving Holiday
- Lineus Medical Receives Patent for SafeBreak® Vascular Generation 2
- New 2025–2026 Energy Rebates: Squeaks Services Explains How to Qualify
- CCHR's New Documentary Prescription for Violence Highlights Overlooked Safety Warnings
- Men's Health Network Announces a New Feature to Support the Well-Being of Men When and Where They Are through Text Alerts
- Comp-U-Floor Unveils Powerful New Commercial Module
- Revenue Optics Announces the Appointment of Sonal Chowdhury as Senior Manager – Strategic Operations
- How California Convinces Buyers Not to Purchase New Cars — and How This Hurts Dealers
- Zaaz Hosts First-of-Its-Kind Creator Series Event in Seattle Studios
- Tax Fears and Political Volatility Drive Wealthy UK Residents to Consider Leaving, La Vida Survey Shows