The Media Should Protect the Public When It Comes to Boeing — But Does It?
Washingtoner/10318535

EVERETT, Wash. - Washingtoner -- For more than two decades, Boeing has operated without AS9100 certification, the foundational aerospace quality standard required of every supplier in the global aviation ecosystem. Yet major news outlets have consistently avoided reporting this fact — a silence that raises urgent questions about whether the media is protecting the public or protecting its access to one of the world's most powerful aerospace manufacturers.

40‑year quality expert and Boeing shareholder DARYL GUBERMAN, founder of the GUBERMAN Anomaly, has released new findings showing that key Boeing and accreditation documents have been scrubbed from the internet, including supplier bulletins, accreditation committee rosters, and oversight memos that contradict Boeing's public narrative.

https://youtu.be/mVzykVMIRhA



Scrubbed Documents Raise New Questions About Transparency

Guberman reports that several critical documents have disappeared from public access:

• Boeing's April and July 2002 Supplier Bulletins, which instructed suppliers to send certificates and ship parts without on‑site audits, have been removed from Boeing's website.
  
  
• The ANSI–ANAB Management Systems Accreditation Committee roster, which once listed a Boeing representative as a voting member capable of granting, suspending, or withdrawing certifications, has been removed from the internet.
  
  
• A July 2012 memo written by that same Boeing representative — warning accreditation bodies about "unaccredited certificates entering the accredited ecosystem" — has also been scrubbed.

"These documents are foundational to understanding Boeing's 24‑year absence of AS9100 certification," Guberman states. "Their removal raises serious questions about transparency and oversight."

More on Washingtoner

• Tacoma: Statement from District 4 Council Member Sandesh Sadalge on the Critical Importance of Centering Equity in Regional Transit Decisions
• Seattle Filmmaker Maikaru Launches Mainasty Press with Ambitious "21 Novels in 21 Months" Initiative
• Tacoma: Street Closure Projected to Start the Week of April 20 for Residential Street Restoration Program Maintenance Work
• Colorfront Launches New Mac App For Creating Apple Immersive Video
• Michele Mundy's "Divinely Tailored" Gains Momentum

Guberman maintains original copies of all documents in his forensic archive.

Media Access Over Public Safety

According to Guberman, the modern media landscape is driven not by truth, but by access — access to executives, plant tours, internal briefings, leaks, and narrative control. This dependency, he argues, has created a system where journalists avoid asking the most basic question in aerospace:

"Where is Boeing's AS9100 certificate?"

Guberman recounts that after he stood up at a DHS Subcommittee hearing on April 17, 2024 — uninvited and under threat of arrest — Bloomberg and Politico approached him. When he showed them Boeing's 2002 supplier bulletins proving the company had abandoned on‑site audits, their response was blunt:

"We can't tell the public that. If we do, nobody will fly."

Guberman states that this moment revealed the core problem:

The media is not protecting the public. It is protecting its access to Boeing.

A Pattern of Silence Surrounding Boeing's Oversight Failures

Guberman's findings highlight a series of systemic failures that the media has consistently avoided reporting:

• Boeing built more than 12,000 aircraft in an uncertified environment.
• Boeing mandated AS9100 for suppliers while never holding it themselves.
• Boeing abandoned supplier audits in 2002.
• Boeing influenced accreditation bodies responsible for policing them.
• Boeing self‑certified its own aircraft under FAA delegation beginning in 2009.
• Boeing's VP of Quality made public statements about AS9100 compliance contradicted by Boeing's own workforce.
• Boeing employees reported no AS9100 training, no internal audits, and missing job‑packet documentation.

Guberman personally verified these conditions during a month‑long investigation in Everett, Renton, Auburn, and Northfield in late 2024.

More on Washingtoner

• Evermore Bliss Launches AI Wedding Speech Writer to Help Users Create Personalized, Heartfelt Toasts
• Keenethics enters the ChatGPT Apps ecosystem as a new growth opportunity for businesses
• Spring Into Your New Home at Heritage at South Brunswick
• UK Financial Ltd Launches UKFL Premier One as Its Official Broadcast Channel for Premium Content, Podcasts & Independent Expert Analysis
• The Great Junk Hunt Returns to Its Roots in Puyallup

The Public Believes the Media Is Watching — But the Media Is Looking Away

Guberman argues that the public assumes the media is acting as a watchdog.

But when it comes to Boeing, the watchdog is silent.

"Instead of exposing the truth, they sanitize it. Instead of asking the hard questions, they recycle Boeing's talking points. Instead of warning the public, they shield the public from the truth," Guberman states.

He asserts that this silence has contributed to tragedies such as the 2018 and 2019 MCAS crashes, which killed 346 people, and to the continued erosion of public trust in aviation oversight.

The GUBERMAN Anomaly: The Truth the Media Cannot Print

The GUBERMAN Anomaly documents the full timeline of Boeing's certification collapse, including:

• The 2002 abandonment of supplier audits
• The 2003 ANSI–ANAB Heads Up 22 mandate
• The 2009 FAA delegation of authority
• The 2012 Boeing‑linked accreditation memo
• The 2014–2024 Boeing presence on the ANSI–ANAB accreditation committee
• The 2018–2019 MCAS failures
• The 2024 DHS Subcommittee revelations
• The 2024 on‑site employee interviews contradicting Boeing's public statements
• The removal of key documents from Boeing, ANSI–ANAB, and IAQG websites

Guberman states that publishing this information would not only expose Boeing — it would expose the media's own failure to protect the public.