Life Insurance Claim Denied for Drunk Driving Pays Out After Investigation
Washingtoner/10260962

LOS ANGELES - Washingtoner -- The importance of retaining a specialist when you have a life insurance claim investigation.

A California man died in a car crash when his Tesla slammed into a parked fire truck. An investigation showed the Tesla was operating under the full Self-Driving mode when the crash happened. Blood testing results showed the driver had a blood alcohol level of 0.09 (just over the legal limit in California).

The man had life insurance and the family filed a claim for the benefits. To their surprise the life insurance claim was denied because of an exclusion in the policy. The exclusion stated that if the insured dies of injuries that happen while drunk driving the policy will not payout.

More on Washingtoner

• Grow My Security Company Launches Next-Generation Website and Expands Strategic Marketing Solutions for the Security Industry
• $4.8M in Contracted AI Revenue with Projections of $30M Over 6-12 Months for Diversified AI Software and Platform-Based Services Provider XMax Inc
• Michelangelo's Great Secret Hiding in Plain Sight
• Longevity Academy Launches The Longevity Leaders Project with Interview of Respira Global CEO
• From Blank Page to Published Book

The family hired the Center for Life Insurance Disputes to fight the denied life insurance claim.

The Center discovered that Tesla's full Self-Driving function had a significant history of malfunctioning leading to numerous auto accidents – some deadly. The Center also uncovered that two blood test were done post-mortem but because of traffic fatality laws in California only one test result was used by the authorities. However, state regulations for traffic accidents only apply to authorities and don't allow an insurer to obfuscate their fair handling obligations.

The Center took their fight directly to the life insurer and won the appeal.

First, they showed that based on promises by Tesla about the full Self-Driving mode and the large number of accidents that happen while the Self-Driving mode is engaged the insured's alcohol level was immaterial.

More on Washingtoner

• Virginia Marchese's Paradox: A Nation Still Deciding Who Belongs Examines Race, Migration, Law, and America's Unfinished Struggle for Equality
• Larry R. Wasion's Jump Gate III RoadMaker Blends Cutting-Edge Sci-Fi with High-Stakes Space Exploration and Complex Technologies
• American Mensa and Davidson Institute Join Forces To Strengthen Support for Profoundly Gifted Youth
• SpeedyIndex Rolls Out Automated API for Mass URL Verification, Solving the Backlink Blind Spot for SEO Agencies
• KLEKT Announces Appointment of Jay Kimpton to Board of Directors

Next, with the assistance of a seasoned toxicologist, they argued that the blood alcohol testing used for the Cause of Death did not sufficiently prove the man was intoxicated at the time of the accident. Rather, the second blood test result showed a blood alcohol level of only 0.07 (below the legal limit) and the insurer was obligated to weigh both results equally.

Without any refusal from the insurer to accept the findings and that the insured was not drunk driving at the time of the accident. The claim was quickly paid and interest was piled on.

Another win by The Center for Life Insurance Disputes.