Trending...
- Joseph Nybyk aka Neibich of Gilbert, Arizona
- New Home of the Month: Spacious Luxury Meets Modern Design in The Bristol at Heritage at Manalapan
- Tacoma: Homicide Investigation – 1200 block of South M Street
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Washingtoner -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
- Spokane: Flags Lowered for Former State Legislator Sam Hunt
- J&J Exterminating Celebrates 65th Anniversary and Unveils Strategic Vision at Annual Team Meeting
- Tacoma: OMWBE Certification 201 Workshop on May 28
- Tru by Hilton El Paso Airport Opens to Guests
- Zenylitics Announces Leadership Transition to Continue Accelerated Growth
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
- A Statement from Pierce County Executive Ryan Mello and Tacoma City Council Member Kristina Walker on Vote Regarding Sound Transit 3 Long-Range Financial Plan
- Wellness Technology Distributor Helping People Set Up Wellness Center Businesses
- City to Establish Spokane Urban Native Advisory Council
- Christian Apocalyptic Thriller Explores Biblical Prophecy, Global Technology, & the Rise of the Ant
- The Hidden Price Of Lost Property In UK Schools
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on Washingtoner
- Accelerating Toward Commercialization as FDA Momentum, AI Neurotherapy & Manufacturing Expansion Drive Multi-Catalyst Growth Story; N A S D A Q: NRXP
- New Wisconsin Report Shows Most Plane Crashes Happen Outside Major Hubs
- Egypt Selects Gonzaga University and City of Spokane as Team Base Camp Training Site for FIFA World Cup 2026™
- Book Florida Keys Accommodations Early with KeysCaribbean and Save 15 Percent
- Color Card Administrator Highlights Growing Enterprise Demand for Workflow Orchestration in Enterprise Business Card Governance
- Tennessee Laws Lead with Psychotropic Drug Testing in Mass Shooting Cases and Comprehensive Reporting: CCHR Urges Nationwide Adoption
- Curious About Mensa? DFW Event Offers a 1-Day Immersion
- Tacoma: Applicants Sought for the Transportation Commission
- Tacoma: Update Homicide Investigation – Arrest – 1200 block of South M Street
- Tacoma: Homicide Investigation – 1200 block of South M Street
- Buzzblender Announces Launch of Simple Hotel Mode for Android and Upcoming Video Wall Support for Samsung Professional Displays
- How Strategic WooCommerce Development and Digital Marketing Helped a Fashion Ecommerce Business Increase Revenue by 3X
- VIV Welcomes Residents to St. Petersburg's EDGE District
- Evocative Joins the Independent Data Centre Network (IDCN) as Primary USA Operator
- Medical Experts Highlight the Importance of Second Opinions in Death Investigations
- Joseph Nybyk aka Neibich of Gilbert, Arizona
- Omnitronics Unveils 100% Software omniGateDMR and omniGateP25 RoIP Gateways
- KRE PRIME Launches Adaptive Convertible Jumpsuit
- USA Med Bed Helping Home Care Patients with Refurbished Hill Rom Hospital Beds
- Sobreseimiento de Nicolás dos Santos y Jorge Méndez expone demandas millonarias a Paraguay y boicot a la Hidrovía
