Trending...
- BESTBUYSTORE opens its dropshipping model to independent merchants
- Mr Hospital Bed Cites Hill Rom Hospital Bed Models Best Value Home Care Hospital Beds 2026
- Spokane: SPD Seek Community Assistance in Locating Missing 10-Year-Old
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Washingtoner -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
- Extreme Lead Program Highlights $27 Real Human Traffic Test for Affiliate and Network Marketers
- Call 311 for Non-Emergency Help in City of Spokane Limits
- Paraguay Expedition Offers a Different View of Human Resilience
- Longevity Academy Features Gail Humble, MD of KLOTHO SKIN in the Longevity Leaders Project
- Datavalet Named One of Quebec's Best Workplaces™ for 2026
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
- Phinge Corporation Engages Sheridan Ross PC for Certain Intellectual Property Matters
- Alan Hamilton of Shiver Hamilton Campbell Inducted as a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers
- Slotozilla Hosts Exclusive Halloween Casino Bonuses for 2026
- Remcon Equipment Marks 35 Years as a Conveyor Company, With 1,500+ Systems Built
- "BROOKLYN, BROOKLYN, BROOKLYN" children's book and official YouTube channel launch on October 27th
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on Washingtoner
- Squaawke releases memorial songs for Canadian woman who Homeland Security detained
- 2027 Health Insurance Open Enrollment
- Gahl Sasson Releases "Agents of Chaos & Angels of Change: The Astrology of 2027
- Spokane Police is Seeking Assistance Locating a Missing Adult Male
- LocalsVoted Launches: Local Rankings From Phone-Verified Votes, Not Paid Placement
- Tacoma: Homicide Arrest – 1100 Commerce Street
- Tek84 Unveils New Brand Identity Built to Magnify What Security Officers Can Do
- CoreVar Announces Cooking with AI, an Eight-Topic Live Webinar Series
- Spokane Police Department Makes Arrest in a Decades Old Homicide
- Mr Hospital Bed Cites Hill Rom Hospital Bed Models Best Value Home Care Hospital Beds 2026
- Spokane: SPD Seek Community Assistance in Locating Missing 10-Year-Old
- WOWX labs Closes US$10 Million Founder-Led Growth Financing as WOWX.market Enters Scale Phase
- BESTBUYSTORE opens its dropshipping model to independent merchants
- America's Hometown Thanksgiving Parade in Plymouth, MA, on Saturday, November 21, 2026
- Navigating a Changing Market: How AIX Group Is Responding to a Challenging Year
- 450 Million Revenue Run Rate, Global Telecom Reach and a New Digital Growth Opportunity Take Center Stage: IQSTEL, Inc. (N A S D A Q: IQST)
- Wave Helicopters Takes FLIBS 2026 to New Heights
- Canada's First Data Lakehouse Goes Global in Banking: Nabil Bank Becomes Nepal's First Bank to Implement a True Agentic Lakehouse Platform, DataNature
- Latin GRAMMY-Winning Cuban-American Conductor Dr Yalil Guerra to Lead Pepperdine's Oklahoma!
- Highsfield Showcases Earth Zoom Generator for Cinematic AI Videos
