Trending...
- Applicants Sought for the Tacoma Creates Advisory Board
- Spokane City Council Accelerates Amendment on Abandoned Vehicles
- Jed the Fish, The Rapscallion of Los Angeles KROQ's Airwaves and Provocateur, Has Signed Off at 69
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Washingtoner -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
- City of Tacoma Encourages Community Members to Think 'Beyond the Bin'
- AdvisorVault's Consolidated 17a-4 D3P Service® Full Feature Set Available
- Most Common Car Accidents In America
- Public Hearing on South Tacoma Groundwater Protection District Code Update on May 21
- Co-Creating the Future of ePaper: ZKONG and E Ink at Touch Taiwan 2025
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
- New York Times Exposé Vindicates CCHR: ADHD Isn't Biological, Says Watchdog
- HISTORIC FIRST The First Belief System In Human History To Formally Enshrine The Innate Divinity Of The Infant As Civilization's Central Moral Axis
- Stuck in Place? Why Homeowners Are Building Up Instead of Moving Out
- Crafting the Sound of VS Pop™: The Vision of CR Srikanth
- Lucky Envelope Brewing Celebrates a Decade in the Craft Beer Industry
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on Washingtoner
- Guests Can Save 20 Percent on a Florida Keys Vacation Home Rental with KeysCaribbean's 'Last-Minute Booking Discount'
- All-Woman Trial Team Wins Major Verdict in Major Case
- Iohexol Injection of Beilu Pharmaceutical Receives MA in the EU
- Thrive Cannabis Marketplace Opens New Main Street Dispensary in Las Vegas Arts District
- ReferFriends.io Officially Launches: A New Global Hub for Sharing and Discovering Referral Codes
- Emerging Managers Podcast Launches, Highlighting New Players in Venture Capital Outperforming the Status Quo
- North American Security Launches New Website to Reflect Evolving Industry Demands and Client-Centered Solutions
- FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS AND MAKE-A-WISH HOST FIRST-EVER BAKE-A-WISH CHALLENGE IN HONOR OF WORLD WISH DAY
- Home Run Pest & Termite Control Launches Monthly Mosquito Service to Help Wylie, Plano, and Rockwall Homeowners Reclaim Their Backyards
- Jayson Warner Smith joins the cast of Tulsa King, The Good Daughter and Murdaugh Murders in 2025
- Digital Watchdog and Deep Sentinel Partner to Deliver Integrated AI-Powered Security Solutions
- Applicants Sought for the Tacoma Creates Advisory Board
- Local Leap Marketing Wins Creative Excellence Award for Healthcare Web Design
- Spokane: Mayor, City Council Announce New Traffic Safety Improvements
- Home Run Pest & Termite Control Delivers No-Contract Pest Solutions to Wylie, Rockwall & Surrounding Areas
- Lauren Coyle Rosen Unveils Debut Album 'Purify Flame'
- Spokane: First AED coming to Dwight Merkel, thanks to Project 100 donation
- American Mensa Welcomes 7-Year-Old Savannah Boy
- Portland Hosts Mensa's 2025 Mind Games®
- T&S and US Conec Ink Global Licensing Deal on MDC Technology to Advance High-Density Optical Interconnects