Trending...
- Primeindexer Google indexing platform launched by SEO Danmark APS
- Spokane: Water Wise Wednesday Workshops Begin March 4
- Amicly Launches as a Safety-First Social App Designed to Help People Build Real, Meaningful Friendships
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Washingtoner -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
- Spokane: City Council Adopts "Immigration Enforcement Free Zones" Ordinance
- Spokane City Council Approves Prohibition of Kraton Sales
- Jason Caras Launches The Caras Institute Following Successful Exit from IT Authorities
- Tacoma: Mayor Anders Ibsen to Deliver First State of the City Address on March 4
- Serina Damesworth Hired as Century Fasteners Corp. – Director of Quality
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
- City of Tacoma to Host Free Virtual 'Capability Statements 101' Workshop on March 11
- City of Tacoma to Host Free 'AI for Small Business' Workshop on March 10
- Spokane: Downriver Golf Course Opens March 6, 2026
- National Expansion Ignited Across Amazon $AMZN, Chewy $CHWY & Walmart $WMT: NDT Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Stock Symbol: NDTP) $NDTP
- Distributed Social Media - Own Your Content
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
Filed Under: Financial
0 Comments
Latest on Washingtoner
- Juego Studios Extends Full-Cycle Game Development & Outsourcing Capabilities to the UAE Market
- Spokane: Funding Available for Tourism and Cultural Investment Grant
- VENUS Goes Live on CATEX Exchange As UK Financial Ltd Activates The Premier Division Of The Maya Meme's League
- Our Purpose —To give "We The People" their voice back—
- Atlanta Tech Founder Seeks Clarity on Intellectual Property and Innovation Policy
- Spokane: SPD Releases the Names of the Officers Involved in the OIS on Carlisle
- Spokane: Water Wise Wednesday Workshops Begin March 4
- Purple Heart Recipient Honored by Hall of Fame Son In Viral Tribute Sparking National Conversation on Service Fatherhood, Healing and Legacy
- Firefighters Contain Two Separate West Spokane Fires Thursday Afternoon
- Tacoma: WIAA/Gesa Credit Union Basketball Tournament
- Amicly Launches as a Safety-First Social App Designed to Help People Build Real, Meaningful Friendships
- Primeindexer Google indexing platform launched by SEO Danmark APS
- Kaltra Introduces New Downward-Spraying Distribution Technology to Boost Microchannel Evaporator Performance
- Talentica Announces Winners of Multi-Agent Hackathon 2026
- Tacoma: Applicants Sought for the Public Utility Board
- Special Alert: Undervalued Opportunity: IQSTEL (N A S D A Q: IQST) Positioned for Explosive Multi-Year Growth
- Triple-Digit Growth, Strategic N A S D A Q Uplist, Plus A Scalable Healthcare Rollout Model: Stock Symbol: CDIX
- Vesica Health Receives FDA Breakthrough Device Designation for AssureMDx
- Spokane: The Creek at Qualchan and Esmeralda Golf Courses Open March 2, 2026
- Lineus Medical's SafeBreak® Vascular Added to Alliant GPO Contract
