Trending...
- Flags Lowered for Spokane County Sheriff Deputies
- Technical Brief Examines Enterprise Integration Challenges as AI Agent Platforms Expand
- New Omega-3 Fish Oil Under NIH Investigation: What Makes It Different From EPA and DHA?
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Washingtoner -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Washingtoner
- Spokane City Council Passes Chronic Nuisance Properties Ordinance
- City of Spokane and City Council Announce 2027 Legislative Priorities
- LCH2 Awarded Additional $1 Million to Advance Lewis County Clean Energy Campus
- Security Planning Tips For Your Holiday Event From Access Patrol Services
- Tacoma: Council Member Sandesh Sadalge Focuses Today's District 4 Town Hall on the City's Biennial Budget
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Washingtoner
- City of Tacoma Awarded $2.25 Million in Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Funding for South 21st Street Corridor
- New Self-Service Sandbag Station at Tacoma Recovery and Transfer Center
- Contracting Resources Group Receives 2026 HIRE Vets Platinum Medallion Award
- Business News & Info Goes Inside Paragon FX Group's Hunt for Original Film Props
- Kitchen Table Economics: An Invitation to Think Differently
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on Washingtoner
- Christmas Beats Summer in Paris: Travel Photoshoots Peak on Dec. 30
- Qscription Technologies Welcomes Joanna Krause, MD, MRMD to Its Clinical Advisory Board
- Jamie Foxx's SKVLK Fest Sets the Record Straight on Stabbing Reports Following Star-Studded Celebration
- Andrew Balzano Releases One of My Life's Passions: Classics and Mysteries, a Fan's Guide to Great Mysteries Worth Rewatching
- Spokane: City Details Veterans Day Schedule
- The 4th Annual Newark Summit for Economic Development, Placemaking & Innovation Returns on December 8th
- Romanian Software Company ASSIST Software Ranks Second Nationally Among Large Enterprises in Its Category
- Washington Nurse Introduces Nightingale Care Hub to Help Families Organize Care
- HIRO Ostomy Belt Launch by Richard O'Hamill
- New Omega-3 Fish Oil Under NIH Investigation: What Makes It Different From EPA and DHA?
- Flags Lowered for Spokane County Sheriff Deputies
- Technical Brief Examines Enterprise Integration Challenges as AI Agent Platforms Expand
- ARADIA (Est. 1991) Launches First B2A Partner Program for AI
- OncoBeta Introduces Rhenium-SCT for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer at Theageneio Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki
- Spokane: Drugs and Guns Seized in a Counter Narcotics Investigation
- Brian G. Miller Co., LLC Receives Tier 1 Ranking in the 2027 Edition of Best Law Firms®
- The Villari Firm, PLLC Named to the 2027 Edition of Best Law Firms
- Spokane: City and County Issue Joint Housing and Homelessness Funding RFP
- Spokane: Council Approves Additional Funding to Prepare for Inclement Weather
- Bacchus Wine & Spirits and Michelin Guide–Recommended Ethel's Fancy to Host Exclusive LOUIS XIII Limited Edition Diwali Decanter Celebration
